A popular American author/pastor name Rob Bell recently released a book entitled Love Wins: A Book about Heaven and Hell and the Fate of Every Person who Ever Lived. Even before the book was released there was a firestorm of controversy surrounding the book. An editor from Crossway Books named Justin Taylor released a scathing critique of the book after he had read a few chapters. Taylor also critiqued the promotional video that preceded Bell's book. Upon reading Taylor's review a popular Reformed pastor named John Piper Tweeted one statement which read "Farewell Rob Bell." Interestingly, this Tweet created another round of controversy surrounding the book. Many speculated, and I think fairly, that John Piper was stating that Rob Bell had departed from the bounds of Orthodox Christianity by hinting that hell was not a place and that the love of God would not allow people be punished there eternally. But there was an uprising against John Piper for his Tweet. The criticism that Rob Bell was experiencing, in some circles, was equaled by the criticism that John Piper received. Throughout this controversy there was one quote that intrigued me. In a short response to John Piper's Tweet, a random woman wrote to John Piper "Who are you to judge?" Who are you to judge??? This is an extremely popular sentiment in our day. We hear this all the time. "He's so judgmental". "Every time I go there I feel like I'm being judged." When we're feeling really spiritual we quote Jesus and say "judge not lest ye be judged." We believe that everyone else is so judgmental but we almost never say to anyone "you're so judgmental". We announce behind their back that "they're being so judgmental".
Friends, can we at least see the hypocrisy of the statement itself. To say that someone is "judgmental" is itself a judgment. Judgments are a daily activity. We cannot survive in this world with discerning or making judgments. We're constantly judging whether or not we have enough time to run three errands and still make it to class on time. We're judging whether or not there is enough space to make the left hand turn between the two cars that are approaching. You might object to this line of reasoning because it has nothing to do with judging people. You might still believe that judgment associated with people is wrong. But I assure you that you and I are constantly making judgments concerning people. Should I let my kid hang out with that other kid? I'm going to need to make a judgment about the other kid and my kid in order to make that decision. Should I go out to lunch with my co-worker? I'll need to make judgments to decide this. Is my co-worker the same gender as me or a different gender? Where might my co-worker want to go for lunch? What would my boyfriend say? Can we all agree that judgment, itself, is not negative? Proper judgment of situations and others protects us from danger. Judgment is not the issue. The question is, What is proper judgment? According to the Bible, What are the right and wrong ways to judge situations and others? Part 2 coming next week.
Johnny Pipes Tweets? Didn't know he was into that kinda thing. Great article, excited for Part 2
ReplyDeleteThanks for sharing, Mark. I totally agree - it was really eye-opening for me the first time I realized that certain judgements towards people are not only not wrong, but they are good, necessary and important in many situations. God has given us the ability to judge good and bad situations, people of good and bad influence, and good and bad theology.
ReplyDeleteRadford-
ReplyDeleteWe ALL judge in some way, shape, or form. These two excerpts are kinda of funny:
"But there was an uprising against John Piper for his Tweet." And..."In a short response to John Piper's Tweet, a random woman wrote to John Piper "Who are you to judge?" Who are you to judge???"
Aren't these people JUDGING?
Well, I had a lengthy comment that got deleted so here is the abridged version - When our understanding of the Cross is skewed, so is our view on salvation. If Jesus came to make our pain go away, or fix our life, or give us better relationships there is no room to talk about forgiveness of sin, abatement of God's wrath, and life eternal. Jesus' work on the cross is made to be a mockery when we reject the latter. If the professing "church" (those who support the heretic Rob Bell and reject Biblical, orthodox Christianity) had a proper understanding of Salvation, we would not be having this conversation.
ReplyDeleteIf we were to "judge" that Rob Bell and others who present his gospel are true, there would be no outcry of "who are you to judge?" The only reason people make this claim is because they are offended by something or do not agree with it. Rob judges that non-believers go to heaven if they are "good." His judgement is well received by the non-believer, so no outcry is heard.
ReplyDeleteTo Andrew,
ReplyDeleteThese are both great points. I once heard an Elder say that "definitive statements destroy conversation." If what he said was true, What had he done? He had destroyed conversation by his definitive statement. It's right along the lines of what your saying.
Haha, that elder sounds very emergent Mark. The emergent church is built around the concept that we need to "be a part of the conversation." "Let's just talk about it." There are no black and white, truth and heresy conversations in the emergent church. The emergent church is a product of post-modernism and the belief that everything can be true to the individual. Therefore, the undertone is that there is no real truth because EVERYTHING is true and NOTHING is false.
ReplyDelete